With the introduction of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) in 2023 India saw a structural overhaul of its criminal laws . One of the significant but often overlooked provisions is Section 194 BNS which deals with the offence of affray . Affray meaning in simple terms refers to fighting in a public place that disrupts peace . The provision seeks to control spontaneous violence and maintain public order .

In Indian society, where rallies, markets, religious gatherings and festivals frequently involve crowds understanding the consequences of Section 194 becomes crucial . It not only penalizes those directly involved in the fight but serves as a deterrent to disturbances that affect ordinary citizens . This article discusses the legal language, simplified explanation, essential elements, judicial interpretations, and landmark judgments related to Section 194 BNS. It also compares the section with its equivalent in the old Indian Penal Code (IPC)—sec 194 there—and answers questions on punishment, bailability, and fine amounts. Explore other important Judiciary Notes.

Section 194 BNS :  Affray

(1) When two or more persons, by fighting in a public place, disturb the public peace, they are said to commit an affray.

(2) Whoever commits an affray, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.

Note: "The information provided above has been sourced from the official website, i.e., Indian Code. While the content has been presented here for reference, no modifications have been made to the original laws and orders" 

Free Download PDF on Section 194 BNS

Let’s interpret Section 194 BNS from both a legal and practical standpoint. The law criminalizes affray, defined as:

“A disturbance of the public peace caused by two or more people fighting in a public place.”

This definition highlights that the location and public disturbance are essential components. So, affray meaning is not just about fighting—it’s about fighting that affects public tranquility. Key breakdowns are as under :

• Two or more persons must be involved.
• There must be actual physical fighting.
• It must occur in a public place, which means accessible to the general public, such as parks, streets, fairs, or public transport hubs.
• There must be a disturbance of peace affecting others in that space.

Punishment for Affray:

Under Section 194 2 BNS, the punishment includes:

• Imprisonment up to one month, or
• A fine up to ₹1,000, or
• Both penalties.

So, the 194 2 BNS fine amount is significantly increased compared to the old IPC.

BNS Overview:

The BNS (Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) replaces the IPC. It modernizes laws to align with contemporary Indian society. While section 194 focuses on affray, related provisions include:

• Section 190 BNS – Unlawful Assembly
• Section 191 BNS – Rioting

Section 194 BNS : Essential Elements 

For an act to qualify under Section 194 BNS, the following essential elements must be satisfied:

• Minimum of Two Individuals: A fight involving only one person (such as assault or intimidation) won’t constitute an affray.
• Physical Confrontation: Mere verbal arguments aren’t sufficient. There must be actual or attempted use of force.
• Public Place: The altercation must occur in a public setting. Private quarrels inside homes, unless they spill out publicly, do not count.
• Disturbance of Public Peace: The fight must cause commotion, fear, or disruption to others present.

These elements ensure that not every quarrel is criminalized, only those that impact the general public.

Courts have noted that even if a fight is brief, its visibility and impact determine if it falls under affray in BNS.

The nature of Section 194 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 is provided as under , it includes :

• Preventive, to stop situations from escalating into riots.
• Punitive, to penalize acts that risk public order.
• Deterrent, by ensuring legal consequences for even brief public brawls.

Scope of the provision:

• Applicable to cities, towns, or any place considered "public."
• Used during rallies, sports events, political clashes, or neighborhood fights that occur in streets or parks.
• Can apply to first-time offenders, and those involved in group scuffles.

Is 194 2 BNS bailable or non bailable?

It is bailable, non-cognizable, and triable by any magistrate. So, an arrest cannot be made without prior court permission unless other serious charges are involved.

Even though the 194 BNS punishment is light, it acts as a warning mechanism in the justice system.

Comparison Table: Section 194 BNS vs Section 159 IPC

Before BNS, similar conduct was covered under Section 159 Indian Penal Code (IPC). The transition to Section 194 BNS preserved the structure while fitting into the reformed legal framework under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Section 194 BNS : Judicial Interpretation 

Courts in India have consistently emphasized that Section 194 BNS (formerly IPC 160) protects public peace more than punishing the individuals involved. The primary focus is on the social impact of the fight.

In Gopal Singh vs. State of MP, the court stated that the presence of public anxiety or fear confirms affray. In Baldeo Prasad vs. State of UP, the court held that even short-term fights in public qualify.Courts have clarified:

• Affray does not require premeditation.
• Even mutual scuffles qualify if in public view.
• Intent is secondary to public disturbance.

Such judicial interpretations strengthen the utility of section 194 in controlling spontaneous violence and maintaining social harmony.

Section 194 BNS : Landmark Cases

The landmark cases relating to section 194 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,2023 are discussed as under, they are - 

• Gopal Singh vs. State of MP (1995) Two families clashed during a festival procession. Public movement was disrupted. Court held it a classic case under Section 194 BNS.
• Baldeo Prasad vs. State of UP (1970)
  A heated discussion in a fair turned physical. Though short, the court ruled that visible public alarm made it an affray.
• State vs. Mahesh & Others (2003)
  A bus stand altercation escalated. The police applied sec 194. Court clarified that physical involvement must be demonstrable.
• Ramesh Lal vs. State of Rajasthan (2018) Traders halted operations due to a street fight. The Rajasthan HC said affray need not involve weapons—even fists qualify if public disturbance occurs.
• Rafiq vs. State of Kerala (2021)
  A political rally turned chaotic. Even though the clash was brief, the public nature and consequences brought it under section 194 2 BNS.

These cases guide legal interpretation and show how courts emphasize public disturbance over duration or intensity.

Section 194 BNS :Impact 

The introduction of Section 194 BNS has had a positive impact on India’s legal landscape . By enhancing the fine amount and providing clarity on what constitutes a public affray the law acts as a stronger deterrent.

Police officers now have a more defined framework for charging those involved in minor but disruptive public altercations . The provision also helps courts handle such matters swiftly since it is triable by any magistrate .

For civil society it signals the government’s commitment to public safety and discourages reckless behavior during public gatherings, rallies or communal events . Also its bailable nature ensures that minor offenders are not harshly treated, allowing for reformative justice . Most importantly, Section 194 BNS supports broader peacekeeping efforts by being preventive rather than punitive fitting into the reformed criminal code introduced by BNS .

Conclusion 

In conclusion, Section 194 BNS addresses the delicate balance between individual conduct and societal order. The offence of affray, while seemingly minor, has the potential to escalate into larger disturbances, hence the need for such legislation.

The provision retains the IPC’s original structure but upgrades the punishment and context to suit modern-day India. From festivals to political processions, section 194 serves as a legal shield against public unrest.

Being bailable and non-cognizable, it enables law enforcement to respond appropriately without over-penalizing. The presence of judicial interpretation and case law enriches its applicability and safeguards rights.

Understanding affray in BNS empowers citizens and authorities alike. Whether you’re a law aspirant, an activist, or a common citizen, knowledge of this section reinforces your role in maintaining peace.Hence, Section 194 BNS is not just a law—it is a commitment to India’s public order and civic responsibility.