Overview
Test Series
Section 294 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) makes it illegal to deal with obscene content. This means you can't sell, show publicly, or spread around items that are considered obscene, and this includes digital forms of such material. The law under Section 294 BNS defines "obscene" as anything that's sexually suggestive in a crude way, designed to excite lustful desires, or likely to morally harm and corrupt people. Explore other important Judiciary Notes.
a) sells, lets to hire, distributes, publicly exhibits or in any manner puts into circulation, or for purposes of sale, hire, distribution, public exhibition or circulation, makes, produces or has in his possession any obscene book, pamphlet, paper, drawing, painting, representation or figure or any other obscene object whatsoever in whatever manner; or
b) imports, exports or conveys any obscene object for any of the purposes aforesaid, or knowing or having reason to believe that such object will be sold, let to hire, distributed or publicly exhibited or in any manner put into circulation; or
c) takes part in or receives profits from any business in the course of which he knows or has reason to believe that any such obscene objects are, for any of the purposes aforesaid, made produced, purchased, kept, imported, exported, conveyed, publicly exhibited or in any manner put into circulation; or
d) advertises or makes known by any means whatsoever that any person is engaged or is ready to engage in any act which is an offence under this section, or that any such obscene object can be procured from or through any person; or
e) offers or attempts to do any act which is an offence under this section, shall be punished on first conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, and with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, and, in the event of a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, and also with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees.
Exception: This section does not extend to,
any book, pamphlet, paper, writing, drawing, painting, representation or figure,
which is kept or used bona fide for religious purposes;
any representation sculptured, engraved, painted or otherwise represented on or in,
Note: “The information provided under Section 294 BNS has been sourced from the official website, i.e., Indian Code. While the content has been presented here for reference, no modifications have been made to the original laws and orders.”
Section 294 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) proscribes offences pertaining to the dissemination of obscene materials. The provision specifically criminalizes the acts of selling, exhibiting, or otherwise circulating obscene objects, encompassing content in electronic formats. The definition of obscene material under section 294 BNS characterizes it as that which is inherently lascivious, appeals to a prurient interest, or possesses the propensity to deprave and morally corrupt individuals. This legislative measure aims to curb the proliferation of indecent content deemed harmful to public morality.
For an offence to be punishable under Section 294 BNS 2023 certain important elements must be present. Mentioned hereinafter are some of the important elements:
This element under Section 294 BNS establishes the subject matter of the offence. The law doesn't limit the form this object can take. It explicitly includes both physical items (like books, magazines, photographs, films, and physical representations) and digital content (text, images, videos, software, etc., stored or transmitted electronically). The key is that it must be something that can be perceived by the senses or accessed digitally for it to fall under section 294 of BNS. This broad definition reflects the evolving ways in which obscene material can be created, stored, and disseminated in the modern age.
This is the most crucial and often debated element. Section 294 BNS, like its predecessor Section 292 of the IPC, defines "obscene" through a set of criteria that courts have interpreted by considering contemporary community standards. The three main criteria of this definition are:
This element under Section 294 BNS deals with the specific actions related to the obscene object that constitutes an offence under Section 294 of BNS. The list is exhaustive and covers various stages of the creation, distribution, and consumption cycle of obscene material:
Section 294 BNS essentially retains the core of Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code, with changes being done in the fine amount of the punishment and with inclusion of electronic form of content within the ambit of this section:
Provision Element |
Section 294 BNS |
Section 292 IPC |
Main Definition |
For the purposes of sub-section (2), a ……read, see or hear the matter contained or embodied in it. Newly added words, "including display of any content in electronic form" |
Same as Section 294 BNS except that BNS expands scope to include digital/electronic content. |
(2) Sale, possession, etc.
|
Whoever, sells, lets to hire, distributes, ..other obscene object whatsoever in whatever manner |
Same as Section 294 BNS |
Punishment 1st Conviction |
Up to 2 years + ₹5,000 fine |
Up to 2 years + ₹2,000 fine |
Punishment Subsequent Conviction |
Up to 5 years + ₹10,000 fine |
Up to 5 years + ₹5,000 fine |
Exception |
This section does not extend to, any book, pamphlet,.....religious purpose. |
Same as Section 294 BNS |
Judicial interpretation of Section 294 BNS by Indian courts has been definitive factor in determining the ambit of section 294 of BNS, mentioned hereinafter are some of the landmark judgments :
Regarding the novel "Prajapati," the Supreme Court stressed that obscenity under Section 294 BNS is different from just being vulgar. For something to be legally obscene, it must have the potential to harmfully influence morals and not just be crude or offensive. The court also pointed out that what's considered obscene can change depending on a community's social and moral norms and who the intended audience is.
This case about a Marathi magazine story saw the Supreme Court reaffirm the "Hicklin test" (later changed by the Aveek Sarkar ruling). The court emphasized that how potentially harmful the material could be to young and easily influenced people is an important factor in deciding if it's obscene.
This case involved an Osho follower being prosecuted for distributing literature considered obscene. While the specifics of the material aren't clear in summaries, the case shows how Section 292 IPC now Section 294 BNS was applied to religious or philosophical writings and the possible defenses based on the material's context and purpose.
This case looked at obscenity in the context of a play. The Supreme Court discussed how the "community standards" test has evolved and stressed the importance of judging potentially obscene material by considering the whole work and its artistic value.
Section 294 BNS criminalizes the sale, distribution, and possession of obscene materials, now explicitly including digital content. The core definition of obscenity, focusing on lasciviousness, prurient interest, and the tendency to deprave and corrupt, remains central. Section 294 of BNS updates the provision by acknowledging electronic forms of obscenity and revising the punishment, by increasing the fines.
Download the Testbook APP & Get Pass Pro Max FREE for 7 Days
Download the testbook app and unlock advanced analytics.